History of the NLPA
History of the NLPA
“THE HERITAGE OF NLPA – THE FIGHT FOR JUSTICE”
If you are reading this, you may be considering using
National Legal Professional Associates to have our
attorneys provide research and consulting assistance to
your counsel in your case. Or, you may be an attorney
determining whether you would like to use NLPA
team of research attorneys to assist you in a particular
case.
As you ponder this important decision, we feel it
important for you to know about the unique history of
NLPA and the excellent “track record” that we have
developed over the past two decades in assisting
attorneys and their clients. If you are a defendant
currently facing trial on criminal charges, or you are
fighting for justice on appeal, or contemplating a post conviction
motion, we at NLPA want you to
understand that we have great compassion for the
situation in which you find yourself. As you will learn
when you read this, we have walked in the shoes of a
defendant.
And, if you are an attorney representing a defendant at
any stage of the criminal process, our team of licensed
research attorneys have decades of both practical and
research experience to the table. But to understand
NLPA and how we can help, we want you to
understand our background and how our firm can be of
assistance in these most critical times.
Our Beginning
In 1986, NLPA was formed out of the ashes of the
personal and professional tragedy of its original
founder, H. Wesley Robinson. After practicing law
and then working in the field of investment banking,
Mr. Robinson was prosecuted by federal authorities. He
and his family were shocked and amazed about the
workings of the federal justice system and learned firsthand
what it feels like to be up against the awesome
power of the government.
He also learned first-hand what it was like to trust his
defense attorneys, only to have them turn their back on
him after the convictions were handed down despite the
fact they had been paid large retainer fees.
In the end, Mr. Robinson pleaded guilty to several
charges related to his decade of involvement in the
investment banking field and he served time in federal
prison. While “down,” Mr. Robinson was able to
research his case, discovering the countless mistakes
that were made by his former attorneys. He worked for
three years trying to correct these mistakes and
ultimately gained an early release from prison in
February of 1986.
It was upon Mr. Robinson’s release that NLPA was
formed. His personal experience with the justice system
taught him that a defense attorney alone is often no
match for the unlimited resources and powers of the
federal government. He also learned first-hand how
important it is to maintain communication with the most
busy of attorneys and keep informed about their case.
Our Philosophy
From this experience, NLPA was created with the goal
of providing defense attorneys and their clients with a
source of high quality and aggressive research
assistance at all phases of the criminal justice process.
Mr. Robinson believed that by providing the defense
with a team of research attorneys and paralegals
assist defense counsel, the playing field would become
more even, giving the defense a fighting chance
against the vast resources of the government.
It was from this philosophy that NLPA was born, and
although there have been many changes since 1986,
that philosophy continues to guide NLPA today.
Contrary to many rumors floating around, NLPA
continues to be staffed by licensed attorneys and
paralegal assistants. And, over the years, our staff and
experience have grown. As demonstrated by the
enclosed list of recent victories, NLPA’s track record
over the past two decades is unparalleled. But
NLPA’s success has not made us forget our humble
origin, and the compassion for defendants and their
families that Mr. Robinson brought to NLPA in the
beginning has been passed on to the entire staff,
making NLPA a research firm different from all
others. This is the reason for NLPA’s motto: “We
listen, we care, we get results.”
Who Are Our Critics?
Over the years, despite (or probably because of) our
excellent record of assisting in successfully fighting
the government, NLPA has not been without its critics.
Some prosecutors, lawyers and judges are offended by
NLPA’s existence and the fact Mr. Robinson, who is
a disbarred attorney, consults to the research firm. The
critics say, “How dare a disbarred attorney and former
felon consult with attorneys!”
The Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in the case of
United States v. Johnson criticizing Mr. Robinson and
NLPA. Incredibly, the opinion held that an old NLPA
informational brochure which criticized the federal
justice system and gave suggestions on how to select
an attorney constituted the “unauthorized practice of
law.” The court stated that for NLPA to provide
critical information to a defendant or family member
about the pitfalls of the criminal justice system and
how to go about the business of finding a qualified,
caring attorney to represent them somehow interfered
with the attorney-client relationship. The court’s
opinion also referred to Mr. Robinson as a disbarred
attorney in an apparent attempt to discredit the
licensed attorneys employed by NLPA.
And, Judge Mordue, from the Northern District of
New York recently held that NLPA’s practice of
sending packages of materials including articles and
general information written by law professors and
attorneys from the Public Defender’s Office, constituted
the unauthorized practice of law. At no time did either
order prohibit NLPA from providing its services to
attorneys who authorize and consent to NLPA’s
assistance.
What is clear from these orders is that NLPA may
only provide its assistance pursuant to a "bonafide"
authorization from counsel. Only then can NLPA
work at the direction of counsel. NLPA ceased
sending out the promotional literature which were the
materials that Judge Murphy found to constitute the
unauthorized practice of law. And, when Judge
Mordue issued his order, NLPA discontinued the
particular service that Judge Mordue held to constitute
the unauthorized practice of law.
Although NLPA disagrees with the positions taken by
Judge Murphy in the Southern District of Illinois, and
Judge Mordue in the Northern District of New York,
we respect and comply with those orders. Each
member of NLPA's staff are aware of these orders and
procedures have been put in place so that those orders
are followed.
What Next?
Now that you know a little bit about the history and
principles of NLPA, we urge you to carefully review
the enclosed information about how we can assist
with the pending criminal case. We encourage you to contact us to ask any questions you may have about the
services we can provide.
WE LISTEN, WE CARE, WE GET RESULTS!
|